RSS reader: Akregator vs Liferea, and who won

Once upon a time I was using the Firefox live bookmarks to read my RSS feeds. I was young and knew nothing back then. I was content with visiting the folder holding the bookmarks once in a while and see if anything caught my eye. Ah, those days. What I wouldn’t give to be a free man again, slave to the feed no more.

Alas, it was not to be. I gave in to the dark side. I got myself a proper RSS reader. I was never the same again.

1. What I want from my RSS reader

For one thing, I started installing and comparing RSS readers, worried that I may not be getting the best there is. And I got really picky. I drew up a list of demands. It went like this:

2. Meet the contenders

Liferea screenshot

Akgregator screenshot

I must mention, for the sake of completeness, that I’ve tried quite a few other RSS readers. I’ve thrown aside console readers and stuff using resource-hungry platforms (XUL, Java or .NET). I’ve also passed on stuff that it just not up to polish yet (like Blam or Straw) as well as stuff that is too rudimentary (like RSSyl, a plugin for Claws-Mail). I’ve also had it with RSS readers inside the browser — my Firefox is chock-full of extensions as it is and it’s starting to resemble a kitchen sink.

I narrowed the contest down to two: Akregator (1.2.9) and Liferea (1.4.12). Let’s learn some things about them.

2.1. The good,…

First, let’s give credit where it’s due and point out things that both of these RSS readers do right.

2.2. …The bad,…

Now we turn to things that aren’t so nice. Both RSS readers have their rough spots and there are many places where one of them did things a little better than the other.

2.3. …And the ugly

That’s about it for the nice stuff. Here’s comes the ugly:

3. Who won and why, in a nutshell

Bottom line, I decided I’d go with Akregator. It has some rough spots but it does the essential stuff right: it’s fast, reliable, lets you configure fonts, does search properly and lets you ignore certain feeds but still updates them.

Liferea looks better, has a much better interface (toolbar, menus, search folders); but it’s resource hungry, slow, and failed me by missing the options I wanted most.

Both RSS readers are very good otherwise and, provided the trouble they gave me was specific to my setup or my incompetence, or that you don’t care about the same features that I do, you’ll be able to use either of them with joy.